Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Stuart Parker vs Eliakim Coulibaly Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Parker vs Coulibaly analysis and find out who is favored!
Stuart Parker vs Eliakim Coulibaly Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Parker 1 - 0 Coulibaly
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Parker has won 51.31% of points on his second serve, while Coulibaly has won 46.7%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Parker, in recent form, has won 53.68% of his opponent's second serve points, while Coulibaly has won 53.92%. The same stats for first serve returns are 38.64% and 36.52% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Parker has saved 58.47% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Coulibaly has saved 63.46% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Parker has won 68.97% of matches played (W/L 40/ 18), with Coulibaly winning 59.02% (W/L 36/ 25) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Parker has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 128/ 55), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11). Coulibaly has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 70% (W/L 111/ 48), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Parker has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 71.43% of matches (W/L 35/ 14), where as Coulibaly has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 64.58% of matches (W/L 31/ 17). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Parker winning 1 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Parker winning 2 and Coulibaly winning 0. The last match between Parker and Coulibaly was at the M15 Monastir, 11-04-2024, Second, Hard with Stuart Parker getting the victory 7-5 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:52:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Parker and Coulibaly have played a deciding set 0 times, with Parker winning 0 times and Coulibaly 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Parker winning 0, and Coulibaly 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Parker has played against opponents with an average rank of 170.33 while Coulibaly has played against players with an average rank of 135.18.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Parker has won 56% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Coulibaly has won 45% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Parker has converted 48.39% of breakpoint opportunities, and Coulibaly has converted 44.06% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
Head-to-head: Parker 1 - 0 Coulibaly
619
Rank
346
High
26
Age
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
506
Rank
378
High
22
Age
Plays
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
W
Form
W
W
W
L
W
W
L
W
W
L
65% (181-97)
Career Total W/L
66% (129-66)
82% (23-5)
YTD W/L
63% (19-11)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
1
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Stuart Parker | Eliakim Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 9 |
| Aces (Total) | 4 | 4 |
| DFs (Total) | 2 | 6 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:52:0 | 1:52:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 72% (49/68) | 58% (42/72) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 57% (28/49) | 60% (25/42) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 53% (10/19) | 37% (11/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 55% (6/11) | 50% (4/8) |
| Return Points W% | 50% (36/72) | 44% (30/68) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-5 6-4 |
Stats 
Stuart Parker
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
72%
(
49 of
68)
1st Serve %
58%
(
42 of
72)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
25 of
42)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
11 of
30)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
44%
(
30 of
68)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
36 of
72)
74
Total Points Won
66
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Stuart Parker | Eliakim Coulibaly |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 82% (23/5) | 63% (19/11) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 80% (44/11) | 63% (38/22) |
| Games Win/Loss | 60% (319/216) | 56% (309/239) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 79% (19/5) | 63% (12/7) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 67% (2/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 100% (4/0) | 63% (5/3) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.29 | 0.47 |
| Aces Total | 77 | 124 |
| DFs per game | 0.11 | 0.41 |
| DFs Total | 29 | 109 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:18:23 | 1:27:57 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 171.39 | 65.37 |
| 1st Serve % | 68% (969/1425) | 65% (1083/1659) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (676/969) | 72% (777/1083) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (236/456) | 47% (269/576) |
| BPs Won% Total | 49% (86/177) | 44% (89/202) |
| Return Pts W% | 45% (665/1473) | 43% (745/1730) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 100% (4/0) | 50% (2/2) |
| Futures W/L | 79% (19/5) | 65% (17/9) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 81% (22/27) | 66% (19/29) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 88% (7/8) | 71% (5/7) |
| Deciding Set W% | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (21/21) | 100% (19/19) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (21/0) | 0% (19/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (6/1) | 0% (11/0) |
Stuart Parker Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Max Wiskandt
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve %
69%
(
41 of
59)
4
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
70%
(
32 of
46)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
25 of
41)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
28%
(
5 of
18)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
34%
(
22 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
7-5 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Karan Singh
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
5
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
71%
(
32 of
45)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
28 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
80
Total Points Won
71
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Jumpei Yamasaki
67%
(
33 of
49)
1st Serve %
73%
(
37 of
51)
8
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Felipe Virgili Berini
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve %
57%
(
29 of
51)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
6
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
17 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
23%
(
5 of
22)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
40%
(
21 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
29 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
43
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Maxence Bertimon
73%
(
16 of
22)
1st Serve %
53%
(
8 of
15)
0
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
56%
(
9 of
16)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
33%
(
2 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
50%
(
11 of
22)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
8 of
15)
19
Total Points Won
18
|
2-2 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Max Wiskandt
Player
Stuart Parker
83%
(
39 of
47)
1st Serve %
75%
(
42 of
56)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
2
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
36%
(
15 of
42)
63%
(
5 of
8)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
9 of
14)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
15 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
64
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Filip Peliwo
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
11 of
20)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
33
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Antoine Vincent
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve %
54%
(
29 of
54)
4
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
5
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
54%
(
7 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
9 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
61
Total Points Won
33
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Lukas Pokorny
Player
Stuart Parker
69%
(
40 of
58)
1st Serve %
71%
(
41 of
58)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
65%
(
11 of
17)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
26 of
58)
66
Total Points Won
50
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Stuart Parker
Player
Moerani Bouzige
76%
(
63 of
83)
1st Serve %
59%
(
39 of
66)
3
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
1
60%
(
38 of
63)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
26 of
39)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
40%
(
33 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
27 of
66)
77
Total Points Won
72
|
6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Eliakim Coulibaly Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Edison Ambarzumjan
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve %
64%
(
48 of
75)
5
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
5
82%
(
37 of
45)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
32 of
48)
42%
(
13 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
14 of
27)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
26 of
76)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
79
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Dev Javia
72%
(
54 of
75)
1st Serve %
66%
(
56 of
85)
11
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
44 of
54)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
40 of
56)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
27%
(
20 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
30 of
85)
85
Total Points Won
75
|
6-4 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Giuseppe Tresca
76%
(
47 of
62)
1st Serve %
64%
(
52 of
81)
5
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
8
77%
(
36 of
47)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
34 of
52)
53%
(
8 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
18 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
81
Total Points Won
62
|
6-2 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Takuya Kumasaka
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
65%
(
35 of
54)
1st Serve %
66%
(
27 of
41)
-
Aces
-
0
Double Faults
2
63%
(
22 of
35)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
37%
(
20 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
58
Total Points Won
37
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Pablo Trochu
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
66%
(
40 of
61)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
18 of
40)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
6 of
21)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
13 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
37 of
61)
64
Total Points Won
37
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Aleksandr Lobanov
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve %
62%
(
23 of
37)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
10 of
23)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
10 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
22 of
37)
51
Total Points Won
25
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Robin Bertrand
Player
Eliakim Coulibaly
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
70%
(
57 of
81)
1
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
5
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
20 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
37 of
81)
78
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(3) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Joshua Sheehy
78%
(
39 of
50)
1st Serve %
58%
(
43 of
74)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
29 of
39)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
15 of
31)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
28%
(
14 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
74)
71
Total Points Won
53
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Alex Knaff
64%
(
87 of
136)
1st Serve %
60%
(
77 of
128)
6
Aces
4
10
Double Faults
6
67%
(
58 of
87)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
53 of
77)
53%
(
26 of
49)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
15%
(
3 of
20)
38%
(
52 of
136)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
52 of
128)
136
Total Points Won
128
|
7-6(6) 4-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Eliakim Coulibaly
Player
Loan Lestir
70%
(
26 of
37)
1st Serve %
65%
(
30 of
46)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
69%
(
18 of
26)
1st Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
64%
(
7 of
11)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
32%
(
12 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
28 of
46)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Parker Vs Coulibaly Prediction H2H Images To Share
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
